8 Comments
User's avatar
Nicholas Wind's avatar

EV = RETARDATION IN FULL BLOOM.

There is zero argument here as far as common sense goes.

They are surveillance devices according to David Hawkins who was just killed here in CHINADA a few months ago.

EVs in CHINADA are hilarious to watch.

Expand full comment
Ely's avatar

David Hawkins? Not familiar with the name.

Expand full comment
Mark Heatherbell's avatar

There is no escape, and whatever you do will be wrong.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

It's a hoax for control... This one has been running the long game for forty odd years... They chose the wrong tactic and it is going to backfire... They got desperate by labelling one hot summer "global boiling" in Europe, but no one bought into it... They know it's a failure ...

Because China is owned by the WEF (all elites factories are there, and the only place other than Davos to have a yearly WEF meeting, a country definitely owned by the elites... Also citizens live the lifestyle the WEF want for us) you can see the WEF do not believe their own narrative.

China still building coal power plants (and nuclear) because the Davos elites want cheap power for their factories. If it were a true emergency, elites would demand new coal power plants stop (not just the lip service of "we'll do it in the future" for China)... Also Chinese scientists would be saying to Xi ... This is serious, we're the biggest emitter, we're all going to die, and Xi would immediately halt for the sake of country and all Chinese. But not happening is it? 🤔 hmmmm...

You nailed it about carbon, such a low percentage of the atmosphere, and probably contributing the least to global warming, and Australia the lowest emitter of all (even negative emitter if you count the "carbon sinks" of miles and miles of bushland.

At Davos they will be regrouping and planning a new narrative as so many see through this hoax...

Expand full comment
Ely's avatar

The awake ones know it's a fraud but so many are seduced by the narrative the same as the Covid narrative, except the young are enthralled with Climate Change. They are our future "leaders". Heaven help us.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

It's been a part of school curriculum for ages, plus they get a day off of school to protest, but it's all sanctioned by the schools and the government... Someone in a stack had said it well, that "the powers that be" doesn't like it when we protest against their narrative, but if it fits in, it is allowed, even encouraged... Going one better why not indoctrinate the kids at school with the divisive narratives and false doomsday crisis narrative so they come out compliant and angry, so they burn out their young energy on pointless issues, while the true issues of control and exploitation can carry on unchallenged in the background.

Expand full comment
Ely's avatar

While some find the truth, many have their brains indelibly programmed.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

It's hard to deprogram yourself... I think exposure two two sides of the story certainly helps. As a child the news on TV seemed important to my dad... These people knew what was important, time to listen to the issues.

So you think you're getting the full story... Maybe a little back then? Maybe it's always been a corrupted narrative.... One thing that is not on the news now, is opposing voices, that sticks out...

News stories always had, on any issue, "but opponents say..." Where you heard an opposing view, that may change your mind on an issue...

I haven't heard "but opponents say.." for YEARS on a mainstream news story... Especially around covid or climate.

If they do acknowledge another viewpoint, it's no longer respectful, no "opponents say"... But "far right", "conspiracy theories", "antivaxxers"... Where's balance when you're already calling the opposing view derogatory names?? As a journalist it should be respectful engagement on a story, not smearing it to take a particular side...

But yes, if you spot the programming that is happening and seek out the other side, you may break free ... But many remain trapped, due to trusting the sources of information you are presented with and not knowing (or caring) to look any further.

I don't know whose substack this came from (maybe Dr Tony Rogers?) But I had captured a good few sentences from it:

"She is what the "left" used to be. I really hesitate to use that word "the left" but you know what I mean. That part of the political spectrum that stood up to The Man for The Little Guy. That "left".

Well, The Man figured out something very clever, I think, after Occupy Wall

Street*. The Man realized

that if young people and

the rebellious types are

SEEKING A CAUSE, WHY NOT PROVIDE THEM WITH ONE?

In fact, why not offer

SEVERAL CAUSES, causes

that The Man is perfectly

comfortable with? These

are causes designed for

the naturally disagreeable and rebellious spirit to CONSUME AND EXHAUST itself over. You know, issues like Climate Change, Racism, Gender, Public Health - those sorts of things.

It's like The Man bought the kitten a fake, battery- powered mouse to chase around all day."

Great point he made there... Our causes programmed into us from youth to occupy and exhaust us, so "the man" is free to enact their greater schemes on humanity.

*I think the man was working on this long before Occupy Wall Street

But yeah, deprogramming from such a collusion of propaganda and cult like tactics of the media, big business and politics is hard without alternative viewpoints allowed... Hats off to anyone who has managed to break free of it all... Luckily that's quite a few of us it seems... But we need a much bigger awakening... Our kids have it tough as this is part of their foundational "education" now... and who wouldn't want an officially sanctioned day off school to protest climate change? It has two effects, indoctrinating kids and associating fun and bonding with climate change "issue"... It also looks good on TV, vast crowds, to sway public opinion... Think of the children type messaging, strengthening adult perception of an emergency... All theatre and propaganda of course, but that suits the elites purpose of control.

Think the two minute of hate in 1984:

"The political purpose of the Two Minutes Hate is to allow the citizens of Oceania to vent their existential anguish and personal hatred toward politically expedient enemies: Goldstein and the enemy super-state of the moment. In re-directing the members' subconscious feelings away from the Party's government of Oceania and TOWARD NON- EXISTENT ENEMIES" (Wikipedia as rubbish as it is provided a good summary there)

They're using this tactic on our youth, and us... Unfortunately 1984 is where we're heading if we follow their tactics and don't break free ...

Glad a number of us have broken free and seen through it though... Hopefully this represents a larger awakening

Expand full comment