I think we can all agree that Novavax is no safer than the other alternatives, simply from the short term adverse events reported in their clinical trial and also what is reported on Australia's TGA site.
We can't always step in someone else's shoes. I have seen many people who were torn between supporting their family and having to inject themselves with these awful products. One of the things people can do to mitigate the effects of the shots is to start Ivermectin, the day of the injection and then continue on for the next 5 days.
If I was a vaccine creator I would be rushing things out left right and centre there will never be another time in history where it’s so easy to get something useless and unsafe approved for population use. If we act fast we can skip all that animal testing rubbish! Etc. At this point many know there is no need to get vaccinated at all but are still being mandated by their employers and are simply asking, which one isn’t going to harm me? Sadly it seems the answer is none of them.
I would still choose Novavax over the mRNA & AZ jabs, if I absolutely felt I had to do it to keep my job (fortunately, I am not in that position at this stage of my life).
It has to be at least a little bit safer, with a measured dose of the modified (toxic) spike protein instead of messing with your own cellular production processes in an uncontrolled way.
But to protect me against covid? No way!
I've been saying from the start: we have not yet developed an effective and safe vaccine against a coronavirus. I have not yet seen anything that would make me revise that conclusion.
Especially after a glimpse at the latest Pfizer document dump release, aka evidence of Pfizer pfraud.
Seriously ??, why would willingly inject an experimental gene based therapy for an illness you don't have ?. You honestly have no idea if it's safer or not and are trusting Individuals that can provably be shown at best, to being mistakenly incorrect, at worst deliberately lied and are continuing to deceive.
There is zero Phase 3 long term clinical data on any of these EUA's to even suggest 'Clinical risk assessment for benefit'.
What to take part on a mass experiment, go right ahead. Smdh.
I did read you're comment. You can object to 'my argumentative tone', it'd doesn't negate the actual substance of my comment itself nor is what i wrote meant in any way to be argumentative or abusive to you personally - i'm am simply responding to your written comment - not you as an individual.
However
"It has to be at least a little bit safer, with a measured dose of the modified (toxic) spike protein..." - your words - is what my comment was addressing, regardless of 'tone'.
There is simply no way to know that it is safer and implies to some (that are maybe not as astute as others and themselves in a position 'forced to choose') that Novavax is somehow less of a risk than other mRNA therapies.
I have not taken a single one, and yes have been unable to work for over two years , while a single parent of two young children. Ultimately, as with all things in life, if i make a wrong (albeit 'forced' or not ) decision that leaves dependants without their Parent, then they are in a much worse situation than simply me being out of work (as difficult and frustrating as that is).
Object to my tone all you wish, social media and TV is replete with people that will refuse to engage because of 'tone'. Smdh.
Dass, I can understand why you are angry. As I would be too.
But please don't take it out on me.
I respect those who refused the jab in spite of attempted coercion, and I feel compassion to those who succumbed. Fortunately, I myself was not in that position, but I have friends and family who were.
Everyone has to make their own decision, for their own circumstances.
If you want to make a point, then there are much better places to do it than as a comment on my comment.
Dass, if you want to respond to my comment, please at least read the comment first!
I'm certainly not recommending that anyone voluntarily subject themselves to this injection, and I don't see any point of dispute except your argumentative tone.
I think we can all agree that Novavax is no safer than the other alternatives, simply from the short term adverse events reported in their clinical trial and also what is reported on Australia's TGA site.
We can't always step in someone else's shoes. I have seen many people who were torn between supporting their family and having to inject themselves with these awful products. One of the things people can do to mitigate the effects of the shots is to start Ivermectin, the day of the injection and then continue on for the next 5 days.
If I was a vaccine creator I would be rushing things out left right and centre there will never be another time in history where it’s so easy to get something useless and unsafe approved for population use. If we act fast we can skip all that animal testing rubbish! Etc. At this point many know there is no need to get vaccinated at all but are still being mandated by their employers and are simply asking, which one isn’t going to harm me? Sadly it seems the answer is none of them.
Well put JJ. We really are in an upside-down world. What's irrational is made rational. What is unscientific is called science.
By the way, I have a friend, JJ. Are you in Australia by any chance?
Yes I am!
Nuva Covid - the x being a Greek C
Another excellent little piece, Ely.
Interesting to watch how this goes.
I would still choose Novavax over the mRNA & AZ jabs, if I absolutely felt I had to do it to keep my job (fortunately, I am not in that position at this stage of my life).
It has to be at least a little bit safer, with a measured dose of the modified (toxic) spike protein instead of messing with your own cellular production processes in an uncontrolled way.
But to protect me against covid? No way!
I've been saying from the start: we have not yet developed an effective and safe vaccine against a coronavirus. I have not yet seen anything that would make me revise that conclusion.
Especially after a glimpse at the latest Pfizer document dump release, aka evidence of Pfizer pfraud.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/are-we-pfinding-pfizer-pfraud-part
Seriously ??, why would willingly inject an experimental gene based therapy for an illness you don't have ?. You honestly have no idea if it's safer or not and are trusting Individuals that can provably be shown at best, to being mistakenly incorrect, at worst deliberately lied and are continuing to deceive.
There is zero Phase 3 long term clinical data on any of these EUA's to even suggest 'Clinical risk assessment for benefit'.
What to take part on a mass experiment, go right ahead. Smdh.
I did read you're comment. You can object to 'my argumentative tone', it'd doesn't negate the actual substance of my comment itself nor is what i wrote meant in any way to be argumentative or abusive to you personally - i'm am simply responding to your written comment - not you as an individual.
However
"It has to be at least a little bit safer, with a measured dose of the modified (toxic) spike protein..." - your words - is what my comment was addressing, regardless of 'tone'.
There is simply no way to know that it is safer and implies to some (that are maybe not as astute as others and themselves in a position 'forced to choose') that Novavax is somehow less of a risk than other mRNA therapies.
I have not taken a single one, and yes have been unable to work for over two years , while a single parent of two young children. Ultimately, as with all things in life, if i make a wrong (albeit 'forced' or not ) decision that leaves dependants without their Parent, then they are in a much worse situation than simply me being out of work (as difficult and frustrating as that is).
Object to my tone all you wish, social media and TV is replete with people that will refuse to engage because of 'tone'. Smdh.
Dass, I can understand why you are angry. As I would be too.
But please don't take it out on me.
I respect those who refused the jab in spite of attempted coercion, and I feel compassion to those who succumbed. Fortunately, I myself was not in that position, but I have friends and family who were.
Everyone has to make their own decision, for their own circumstances.
If you want to make a point, then there are much better places to do it than as a comment on my comment.
'If you want to make a point, then there are much better places to do it than as a comment on my comment.'
Wow, you're now advising me as to where i should or shouldn't opine on something i read in an open public forum.
As i said, it is not personal but merely replying to the 'tone ' of your earlier comment.
Dass, if you want to respond to my comment, please at least read the comment first!
I'm certainly not recommending that anyone voluntarily subject themselves to this injection, and I don't see any point of dispute except your argumentative tone.
Hostility, if any, needs to be directed at the authorities who have pushed these products, not at people who have been put in an awful situation.
No hostility here. If some see daggers where there are none, i can do little about it.
NOVAVAX = Prions (Mad cow disease and Alzheimer) + Saponin-based adjuvant (Matrix-M). Watch dr. Richard Flemming: https://rumble.com/embed/vok7zh/?pub=7ze2t
If you are forced to take the serum, take a look at "Anti-Inoculation Protocol" (PDF): https://www.comusav.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ENGLISH-AI-Protocol-16-Dec-2021-.pdf