One of the widely circulated claims during the pandemic was that COVID-19 vaccines—while not preventing infection or halting transmission—could reduce the severity of illness and keep people out of the hospital.
What if the vaccines were never intended to kill lots of people rapidly?
During my basic training in the Australian Army, way back in the late 1980's, I learned that our role as military combatants in the field was not to kill the enemy outright, but to maim them - contrary to Hollywood action-movie folklore. When an enemy soldier is injured, it requires at least two others to tend to him, thereby diverting precious enemy resources and gradually diminishing their strength.
Might the purpose of the fake-vaccines not have been for a similar outcome, not to kill outright in most cases, but to maim the enemy (i.e.,us)?
In military jargon, a "soft kill" is a strategy aimed at incapacitating the enemy through non-destructive means. A "slow kill" is a related concept more aligned with deterrence or attrition strategies that impose gradual, persistent damage or strategic costs over time rather than immediate destruction. A soft kill can be part of a slow kill approach.
Given that our adversaries play the long game and that their role is to create chaos and destruction on a world scale, it would make sense to view these medical interventions as serving a range of purposes, from initially gauging public compliance or obedience with "mandates" to weakening large populations over time, diminishing our resources and causing long term harm and socio-economic destruction.
We outnumber them, but we also know that most of the world's leaders are Fabians. The Fabian strategy is a military approach that avoids large, direct battles and frontal assaults, instead focusing on gradually weakening the enemy over time through harassment, disruption of supplies, and lowering morale. It is essentially a war of attrition and indirection, designed to wear down a stronger opponent by avoiding decisive confrontations and prolonging the conflict until conditions favour the weaker side, them!
This, I think, best encapsulates the nature of our conflict. From what I’ve seen, however, no one has addressed this topic yet, certainly not the number-crunchers (i.e., epidemiologists and biostatisticians).
We're seeing jab-injured people in clinical practice every day. Some are now gravely ill (e.g., cancer - a former patient with prostate cancer died only last week, another non-smoker has recently had his tongue removed due to tongue-cancer) and others are on medications to manage their now chronic ailments that they didn't have before the fake vaccines. The few "regulars" we see who refused the jabs are not ill.
I've been convinced of their malicious intent since I was a kid in the 1970s, and their assault on humanity has been on many fronts and have included economic, political, military, banking, academic and medical "interventions". We’re just like pawns being moved around on a chess board, and sacrificed whenever it suits them.
Post WW2 Germany’s “Wunderkind” economic miracle was a rapid reconstruction and growth phase, a period that saw West Germany transform from wartime devastation to becoming one of the world’s leading industrial powers within a decade. Progressively, during my childhood there, that gave way to economic hardship, manufacturing decline and impoverishment of the middle classes. My parents ran a small business manufacturing furniture in Germany until they decided to migrate to Australia in 1976 when I was 12 years old. At the time, Australia’s middle classes hadn’t yet quite caught up to the economic destruction experienced by the Germans, but it didn’t take long to remove manufacturing from Australia, did it?
I would argue that the only things keeping our economy buoyant are mining and money laundering (in real estate). When that crashes, likely in 2026, we all crash!
Australia and much of the Western World are now on the same trajectory; one of decline - unless we collectively push back!
I believe this captures the essence of our global conflict most accurately. As far as I know, no one has as yet addressed this topic in terms of a "slow kill" military strategy!
Thank you, Ely, for another insightful article.
What if the vaccines were never intended to kill lots of people rapidly?
During my basic training in the Australian Army, way back in the late 1980's, I learned that our role as military combatants in the field was not to kill the enemy outright, but to maim them - contrary to Hollywood action-movie folklore. When an enemy soldier is injured, it requires at least two others to tend to him, thereby diverting precious enemy resources and gradually diminishing their strength.
Might the purpose of the fake-vaccines not have been for a similar outcome, not to kill outright in most cases, but to maim the enemy (i.e.,us)?
In military jargon, a "soft kill" is a strategy aimed at incapacitating the enemy through non-destructive means. A "slow kill" is a related concept more aligned with deterrence or attrition strategies that impose gradual, persistent damage or strategic costs over time rather than immediate destruction. A soft kill can be part of a slow kill approach.
Given that our adversaries play the long game and that their role is to create chaos and destruction on a world scale, it would make sense to view these medical interventions as serving a range of purposes, from initially gauging public compliance or obedience with "mandates" to weakening large populations over time, diminishing our resources and causing long term harm and socio-economic destruction.
We outnumber them, but we also know that most of the world's leaders are Fabians. The Fabian strategy is a military approach that avoids large, direct battles and frontal assaults, instead focusing on gradually weakening the enemy over time through harassment, disruption of supplies, and lowering morale. It is essentially a war of attrition and indirection, designed to wear down a stronger opponent by avoiding decisive confrontations and prolonging the conflict until conditions favour the weaker side, them!
This, I think, best encapsulates the nature of our conflict. From what I’ve seen, however, no one has addressed this topic yet, certainly not the number-crunchers (i.e., epidemiologists and biostatisticians).
Thanks John. Can they be that specific? We know that the spike protein can spread anywhere in the body, apparently for years it seems.
Having been around healthcare practitioners and some researchers, they get so obsessed with their pet project they develop tunnel vision.
Did someone plan this assault on humanity? It's not out of the question.
I absolutely know it was planned, Ely.
We're seeing jab-injured people in clinical practice every day. Some are now gravely ill (e.g., cancer - a former patient with prostate cancer died only last week, another non-smoker has recently had his tongue removed due to tongue-cancer) and others are on medications to manage their now chronic ailments that they didn't have before the fake vaccines. The few "regulars" we see who refused the jabs are not ill.
I've been convinced of their malicious intent since I was a kid in the 1970s, and their assault on humanity has been on many fronts and have included economic, political, military, banking, academic and medical "interventions". We’re just like pawns being moved around on a chess board, and sacrificed whenever it suits them.
Post WW2 Germany’s “Wunderkind” economic miracle was a rapid reconstruction and growth phase, a period that saw West Germany transform from wartime devastation to becoming one of the world’s leading industrial powers within a decade. Progressively, during my childhood there, that gave way to economic hardship, manufacturing decline and impoverishment of the middle classes. My parents ran a small business manufacturing furniture in Germany until they decided to migrate to Australia in 1976 when I was 12 years old. At the time, Australia’s middle classes hadn’t yet quite caught up to the economic destruction experienced by the Germans, but it didn’t take long to remove manufacturing from Australia, did it?
I would argue that the only things keeping our economy buoyant are mining and money laundering (in real estate). When that crashes, likely in 2026, we all crash!
Australia and much of the Western World are now on the same trajectory; one of decline - unless we collectively push back!
I saw two extended family members die within 7 months.
I believe this captures the essence of our global conflict most accurately. As far as I know, no one has as yet addressed this topic in terms of a "slow kill" military strategy!