I don't wish to be difficult, but it seems important to consider that the people who made up the evil Covid policies, hurt billions of people, shut down millions of businesses, bankrupted many people and companies, and did much other harm don't view their policies as failed. They profited enormously. They made money for the military industrial financial pharmaceutical complex and the big billionaires.
Also they have made it clear for seventy years that they hate humanity and want to enslave mankind. They enjoy seeing others suffer. They worship demons. They brought a demonic witch to invoke demons at their current event. They rape children. They torture babies and drink adrenochrome blood. They are individually evil. And they believe themselves to be more powerful than God.
So, no, they're not of the opinion that they failed. Yet.
That’s why I mentioned one place they did succeed was the huge financial windfall received by Pfizer. What’s coming out is how shameful the actors were, not to mention that criminality of the highest order took place.
But the people doing these things are not ashamed. They are certainly shameful as you say. But they don't have any view of the immorality of their actions requiring hiding them or looking shame faced about them. They "don't care about" morality. They believe themselves above God. I believe they are going to be brought low. Hubris kills.
It's a reasonable diagnosis. But I am iffy on the whole psychology profession. I see a lot of names for things that are not understood as if by giving a name to each "disorder" the taxonomy is going to be helpful.
My own mentality is afflicted with "oppositional defiance disorder," which I gather is the new name for "drapetomania." The overwhelming desire to escape slavery.
One of the problems of post modern education is the refusal to accept any standard of ethics, decency, or humanity. So the psychologist is unwilling to use good judgement because all standards are regarded as unworthy. Which is clearly not working very well.
I don't wish to be difficult, but it seems important to consider that the people who made up the evil Covid policies, hurt billions of people, shut down millions of businesses, bankrupted many people and companies, and did much other harm don't view their policies as failed. They profited enormously. They made money for the military industrial financial pharmaceutical complex and the big billionaires.
Also they have made it clear for seventy years that they hate humanity and want to enslave mankind. They enjoy seeing others suffer. They worship demons. They brought a demonic witch to invoke demons at their current event. They rape children. They torture babies and drink adrenochrome blood. They are individually evil. And they believe themselves to be more powerful than God.
So, no, they're not of the opinion that they failed. Yet.
That’s why I mentioned one place they did succeed was the huge financial windfall received by Pfizer. What’s coming out is how shameful the actors were, not to mention that criminality of the highest order took place.
I do understand you.
But the people doing these things are not ashamed. They are certainly shameful as you say. But they don't have any view of the immorality of their actions requiring hiding them or looking shame faced about them. They "don't care about" morality. They believe themselves above God. I believe they are going to be brought low. Hubris kills.
I believe there’s a name for that—psychopath.
It's a reasonable diagnosis. But I am iffy on the whole psychology profession. I see a lot of names for things that are not understood as if by giving a name to each "disorder" the taxonomy is going to be helpful.
My own mentality is afflicted with "oppositional defiance disorder," which I gather is the new name for "drapetomania." The overwhelming desire to escape slavery.
One of the problems of post modern education is the refusal to accept any standard of ethics, decency, or humanity. So the psychologist is unwilling to use good judgement because all standards are regarded as unworthy. Which is clearly not working very well.
Our words having meaning, so in the context of how we define psychopathy, the behaviour matches the description.