This New Paper Is A Damning Indictment Of The Whole Covid Vaccine Rollout

This new paper with the lead author epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, Dr Stephanie Seneff and Dr Jessica Rose, both research scientists and senior author Dr Robert McCullough, demonstrates what a sham the COVID-19 clinical trials were and the basis for the mass rollout of the experimental "vaccine".

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign

The lead author, who had previously written over 40 papers, got involved because he had a couple of friends who got cancer not long after their injections, rapidly went downhill and died. We would now call these turbo cancers.

In a recent interview on Dr Peter McCullough's Podcast, Mead stated that public and health officials were hoodwinked. Doctors had no idea the basis upon which they were promoting the shots for their patients. One word he used was "criminal".

Remember how Pfizer tried to suppress its data from being exposed for 75 years? Thankfully, a judge would have none of it, and through a Freedom of Information Act request, documents started being released.

So, by painstakingly going through many documents and with almost 300 references, the group found the vaccine's lack of efficacy and how fraudulent the clinical trials were. There was also no justification whatsoever for injecting children with these products.

The trials were stopped prematurely, and the placebo group was coerced to get the COVID-19 shots, which meant they no longer served as a control group. So, an essential part of the trial disappeared when the unvaxed became vaxed.

The real devious action during the trial was considering that no one who received the first shot was vaccinated during the first two weeks because they thought there was no immune protection until at least two weeks––we later found out there was little immune protection at any time. During the two weeks, people were classified as unvaccinated.

And some people became sick and even died as a result of the vaccine. Since they were not considered vaccinated, it skewed the statistical figures to create more unvaccinated with ill health. Also, since you were considered unvaccinated during the first two weeks, this started the message that anti-vaxers were putting lives at risk because they were contracting COVID-19. As Mead stated, they made it look like more problems were occurring in the unvaccinated.

Then there was shot number two. Again, there were a couple of weeks where people were considered unvaccinated. Many who showed no ill effects from the first shot started showing more problems after the second.

So by manipulation, Pfizer had it going both ways; the vaccine was promoted as highly effective––which it wasn't––and fewer adverse reactions if you were vaccinated––completely false. 

We now know that the more you vaccinate, the more you get Covid.

We also know that there is a massive increase in autoimmune disease with mRNA injections compared to influenza.

Part of the conclusion from the paper:

"The usual safety testing protocols and toxicology requirements were bypassed by the FDA and vaccine manufacturers, and the premature termination of both trials obviated any unbiased assessment of potential SAEs due to an insufficient timeframe for proper trial evaluation. It was only after the EUA that the serious biological consequences of rushing the trials became evident, with numerous cardiovascular, neurological, reproductive, hematological, malignant, and autoimmune SAEs identified and published in the peer-reviewed medical literature."

"Since early 2021, excess deaths, cardiac events, strokes, and other SAEs have often been wrongly ascribed to COVID-19 rather than to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations."

"Multiple booster injections appear to cause immune dysfunction, thereby paradoxically contributing to heightened susceptibility to COVID-19 infections with successive doses.

I have another conclusion; they LIED TO YOU!