The Illogical Logic Of Mass Vaccination

There has been a belief system in the medical establishment that if one thing is good, more of it is even better. This relates to the subject of vaccination. Initially, vaccines were given for a limited number of illnesses, and the narrative was that these diseases would disappear. So it appears that many diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus and polio are virtually non-existent––at least in modern Western countries.

In the 1940s, there were only four shots on the vaccination schedule; by the 1960s, it had risen to seven. Now, by age 2, a child can receive as many as 27 shots because of boosters to the ones on the schedule. But that’s not the end of it. By the time a child reaches age 18, they will have received additional shots exceeding 70 or more vaccinations if they follow the number of vaccines on the schedule. Are we really meant to receive so many injections? Modern medicine is injection crazy.

One argument says that because of the vaccines, childhood illnesses have mostly disappeared. For some, there might be some truth to that. There is also the argument that some diseases declined when vaccines were introduced. One such disease is measles. You can see this in the chart below.

The first measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. The incidence of measles has been on a downward trajectory since 1920. One noticeable thing is that the death rate when the vaccine was introduced was 0.1 per 100,000. That equates to 1 death per million people. There is a good argument for the fact that a considerable factor has been the improvements in public health and sanitation. Modern living with improvements in the standard of living has brought the benefits of improved medical treatment and better nutrition. Studies have found that the incidence of measles correlated with lower income and people with disabilities.

An excellent example of a discovery unrelated to vaccination was when Joseph Lister discovered the sterilisation principle with antiseptics in the 1800s. Before that, the death rate from surgical infection was very high. With the use of antiseptics, the death rate from surgery dropped dramatically.

Even later, with antibiotics commencing in the 1940s, people with bacterial-induced diseases had a much higher survival rate. Penicillin, in fact, saved my mother’s life when she contracted a severe pelvic infection during childbirth.

Below is a chart showing the incidence of tetanus in the U.S. since 1900. We see that there has been a steady decline before the first effective vaccine in 1938. Was it the vaccine, or was it an improvement in living conditions?

Source: CDC Surveillance Manual

In 2021, there were four deaths from tetanus in the U.S.; some years, there were none. In total, cases of tetanus are in the range of 25 to 30 a year out of 335 million people, so undoubtedly, it’s a combination of the vaccine and living conditions. How do we know that living conditions affect tetanus?

My wife spent the first year of her medical career practising in the highlands of New Guinea in 1970. Conditions then were very primitive and probably still are today, according to our standards. Women would give birth on the ground, and the tradition was to cut the umbilical cord of the baby with a bamboo stick. The soil in the area is laden with the spores that carry the bacteria Clostridium tetani. This organism releases the toxin, which attacks the nervous system and causes muscle spasms, which can be severe, often starting in the jaw (lockjaw), but can then progress to whole-body spasms called opisthotonos. Below is an old painting depicting the condition.

My wife saw babies dying from tetanus, and she said it was a horrible thing to see. However, we don’t live in the highlands of New Guinea, and if you were to venture there, getting a tetanus shot might be a good idea. However, is everyone susceptible to a minuscule risk in our modern cities? We not only give one shot––effective only for 5 to 10 years––but we are encouraged to have multiple boosters throughout our lives.

Then there is polio, which affects people in different forms; the most severe, of course, is paralytic polio, which can lead to cessation of breathing and death. Even so, the death rate outside of epidemics was not high. Before the 20th century, ironically, polio was more of an endemic disease for which most children had natural immunity growing up in unhygienic environments. With improved cleanliness, children in the 20th century were not as exposed to the same conditions, so they became more susceptible to the virus. Hence, introducing the vaccine appeared to reduce the incidence of polio, though not without its problems. Most polio cases today come from three strains in the vaccines.

This leads to a discussion of problems which have occurred with vaccines, which have caused the diseases they were purported to prevent, including death. Much like the cigarette manufacturers refused for decades to acknowledge that there were problems with their products, the same goes with the vaccine manufacturers.

Some of these incidents are well known. The Cutter Polio vaccine of 1955 gave over 250 children polio, with many becoming paralyzed. In 1976, the Swine Flu vaccine in America caused the deaths of 35 people and paralysis of hundreds of others. In the early 1960s, a Measles vaccine caused a condition caused by Atypical Measles highlighted by this paper: Vaccine-enhanced disease: case studies and ethical implications for research and public health . This still occurs today.

In 2017, in the Philippines, the Dengue Fever vaccine was discontinued when 130 children died from the vaccine, and the event resulted in the prosecution of a researcher for the premature introduction of the deadly vaccine.

Also, in the 1960s, a Respiratory Syncytial Virus vaccine was introduced, which caused an enhanced form of the disease, hospitalizing children with a couple of deaths. Today, there is a big push by the drug manufacturers for people to take this vaccine, which is not without its problems.

Then we come to the mother of all vaccines, the Covid-19 vaccine. There is no reason to go over these details again; they have been documented extensively. All we need to say is that these are the most problematic vaccines in history, causing death, sickness and disability in the millions globally.

The major problem is that people are submitting to vaccination in many cases with blind faith, and they are not given informed consent about the product that is going to be injected through the skin. Most people don't know that most vaccines contain either aluminium or thimerosal–mercury-based preservatives–that are adjuvants and enhance the effects of the vaccines. Most also don't know that vaccines have not been tested for their carcinogenicity––the ability to induce cancer.

In Section 13.1 of the product insert for the MMR vaccine, the following is stated:

M-M-R II vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.

Yet now, children and pregnant women are advised to have all manner of injections. It's actually quite illogical, and some would say criminal, to inject pregnant women with so many injections. Is it any wonder we have so many chronic diseases today: Autoimmune disorders, Autism, Attention Deficit Disorder and multiple cancers? It's like we've replaced many of the past's infectious diseases with many chronic disorders. It's not going to stop anytime soon.

If the rationale is to protect people well, why don't we stop children from being passengers in motor vehicles? Why aren't we immunizing children from cars? After all, from 2011 to 2020 in the U.S., there have been over 1000 children aged 0 to 14 killed annually in traffic accidents. 

Also, an estimated 139,042 children were injured in traffic crashes in 2020. So it begs the question; if we care about protecting children from death and disability, why do we allow children in motor vehicles? Well, you might say that is an extreme position. That's the point; when it comes to vaccination as a preventative measure, we've taken extreme positions with the intent to jab everyone on the planet no matter what their age. We've forgotten the fact that humans have an innate immune system.