If the Climate Fanatics Have Their Way; Our Way Of Life Will Collapse

Why do we continue with the apocalyptic charade that we are in dire straits concerning the climate? "It's an emergency", they shout. Please show me the emergency. The only thing we have gotten is misinformation that has been going on for decades. Every prediction made has been wrong, yet we still give credence to these ideologues. If you had to grade their statements as factual, they would get an "F". 

There has to be some other motivation for the global push to destroy our way of life. That's what this amounts to; the policies being forced down our throats will have dire economic, social, and political consequences. Make no mistake, this is a collaboration between international governments and corporate globalists. It's the new fascism being sold as some benevolent action to "save the planet".

As they say for financial investments, past performance doesn't always equate to future results. However, if you have failed repeatedly, would you trust the investment? Well, the climate prediction failures can be listed, and there are many. Here are just several:

• 1970: Ice age by 2000, Boston Globe April 15.1970

• U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming Source: Washington Post, July 9, 1971

• Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast: The Guardian, Tuesday, January 29 1971

• 1978: 'No End in Sight' to 30-Year Cooling Trend: New York Times, January 5, 1978

• 1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years: The Canberra Times, September 26, 1988

• Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past: The Independent, March 30, 2000

• Rising seas could obliterate nations by 2000: Oshkosh Northwestern, June 30, 1989

• Britain will be plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020: The Guardian February 21 2004

• In 2008, Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap ice-free in five years: COP15 Climate Conference

• Prince Charles: 96 months to save the world: Independent, July 9, 2009

Reference: Real Climate Science

You get the picture. Fanciful predictions are all wrong, and this is what we are basing policy on, which will be destructive and affect those who can least afford it. After all, the elitists can afford expensive electric vehicles. Still, for the average person, these are 40% more expensive than the average petrol-based vehicle. The average person also needs help to upgrade the power supply to speed up charging times.

So what is the motivation? Obviously, controlling the masses by forcing them into mass transportation removes the individual freedom that a motor vehicle provides.

Now there is a push for "green" steel.

Global push for green steel could hit Australia’s $150bn iron ore exports if miners don’t adapt, report finds

Iron ore is the largest of Australia's resources, exported at $150 billion annually. Most of that ore is mined in Western Australia. The push is on for green hydrogen to produce steel. To do so requires high-grade magnetite. The problem for Australia and Western Australia is that it mines mainly hematite, a low-quality ore suitable for conventional smelting but not for the new green net zero push.

This could have devastating effects on the Australian economy. As it is, it takes hundreds of billions of dollars to convert to a net zero economy.

This is all so unnecessary because, as the Clintel Institute states in its latest report:

"'We are on a highway to climate hell', said UN-boss Guterres recently. But an in-depth look at the mortality data shows that climate-related deaths are at an all-time low. Well-known economist Bjorn Lomborg published that important information in a 2020 peer-reviewed paper, but the IPCC, again, chose to ignore it."

In addition, contrary to the media hype, we are not having more severe weather and extreme storms. The frequency of these has not increased, which we have been told would happen with climate change.

The IPCC is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Much like the WHO, they are made up of leftists who hide the truth and exaggerate the interpretation of data to favour their agenda. The IPCC hides good news about climate change and blows anything unusual out of proportion.

We need to realize that the obsession with climate change is unnecessary, as the world's population will decline after 2065. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington's School of Medicine models current trends and shows a drastic reduction in fertility rates in many Western nations. It's already happening. 

The forecast is that by 2100, 183 of 195 countries will have fertility rates below replacement. One billion people will decline globally in the last 35 years of this century. There will be less energy needed, which will continue after 2100.

I can think of more significant threats in the future than climate.

1. A massive earthquake

Currently, the planet's shifting tectonic plates are very active. Massive earthquakes occurred in the past when the earth was less populated, and we weren't so reliant on technology and its infrastructure. Large earthquakes, especially along the Ring of Fire, can result in destructive tsunamis. The 2004 tsunami following a 9.1 earthquake in Indonesia resulted in the death of almost 250,000 people.

Just imagine a mega earthquake off the coastline of America, for instance, Silicon Valley. There have been tsunamis 50 metres (165 feet) in height. That would be devastating to such a populated area and its infrastructure. It would cause physical and economic dislocation.

2. Asteroids hitting the Earth

When we think of asteroids hitting the Earth, we often think it's science fiction. Contrary to Al Gore's imagination, asteroids are a genuine threat. We know this because the Earth has been hit by asteroids before.

The Tunguska explosion: June 30, 1908

This explosion in Siberia was the largest recorded due to an impact of an asteroid.

"Incredibly, the blast released enough energy to kill reindeer and flatten an estimated 80 million trees over an area of 830 square miles (2,150 square km). Witnesses reported seeing a fireball – a bluish light, nearly as bright as the sun – moving across the sky. In addition, a flash and a sound similar to artillery fire was said to follow it. Moreover, a powerful shockwave broke windows hundreds of miles/kilometers away and knocked people off their feet."

The estimated size of the Tunguska asteroid is 65 metres. What if an asteroid one mile across were to strike the Earth? It would be devastation beyond our imagination. If it hit the U.S., it could destroy the entire grid causing catastrophic loss of life. Let us remember that the dinosaurs were wiped out by a giant asteroid––10 kilometres in diameter–– that struck the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico. The crater it created is 150 miles in diameter. I don't mean to scare you, but what should you fear more? The climate "crisis". Really?

3. Nuclear war

In the 1950s and 60s, we had visions of nuclear armageddon during the cold war. What America and Russia have at their disposal right now is an arsenal of atomic weapons that would irretrievably destroy the planet, not just from the death and destruction of nuclear explosions but because of lingering radiation. The plutonium used in many nuclear weapons has a half-life of 24,000 years, causing long-term radiation remaining.

A nuclear war would be a real threat to the climate, resulting in a nuclear winter where particles would obscure the sun. You would have years of global cooling. So if you survived the atomic attack itself, what would beset you is famine and loss of services because all electronic communications would be destroyed. This would be the ultimate nightmarish scenario.

4. Massive solar flare

The image above is courtesy of NASA and shows a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) or solar flare. This is due to geomagnetic storms on the sun projecting out particles that find their way to the Earth. These particles commonly cause atmospheric influences such as the aurora borealis or northern lights.

Once again, these are not theoretical events but have occurred with some regularity.

The worst solar storms in history

The largest one recorded was in 1859, and it knocked out telegraph services and even shocked operators. Technology has advanced beyond the telegraph, but we are now more vulnerable.

A large solar flare would knock out power plants, transmission lines, and substations for entire regions or cities. Vast swaths of the world's population could be without power for weeks, leading to health crises, food shortages, and devastating economic effects. Climate change, anyone?

5. Explosion of a Super Volcano

Beneath Yellowstone, a volcano that could wipe out U.S.

Those who have been to Yellowstone know it is frothing with hot springs and geysers. Under that beautiful natural tourist site lies a deadly caldron in waiting. We know that it's not just speculation. The park sits on a caldera, a remnant from a volcanic explosion that has occurred several times over the past few million years.

Will the volcano erupt soon? Probably not, but another is coming. Here again, we know the history, which tells us it is a potentially deadly event waiting to happen. In previous eruptions, ash completely covered the United States. This massive active volcano could destroy life in the U.S.; it's just a matter of when.

So climate change is being forced on us because of unfounded fear and because vested interests want to push their agenda. It's the same modus operandi that was used with Covid. It is what amounts to a totalitarian shift in the West. The prosperous economic system since the Industrial Revolution will suffer badly if the "experts" have their way. It's irrational and with little merit.