Erosion of Freedoms: What Every Australian Needs to Know
Do you think it's over as far as the Covid tyranny is concerned? I wouldn't bet on it. The assault on our freedoms that we experienced for the better part of three years has not totally disappeared. If you're a medical doctor and refuse to toe the line, getting the jab in a hospital setting, you'll be out of a job. The government wants to ensure it can exert its power to dictate when and if it declares a medical emergency and force you to take whatever jab it deems necessary.
The whole COVID program was a sham and flagrant violation of human rights inflicted on the Australian public, and the gaslighting continues. So, what did we know about COVID-19 early on and its vaccination program?
The 'vaccine' was experimental.
It was never adequately tested over several years, as would have been prudent. Still, it was rushed out based on false claims from the clinical trials.
The 'vaccine' has killed many Australians.
We know that since the rollout of the vaccines, excess mortality increased in Australia and correlated closely with the number of doses given to people. Unfortunately, many Australians have succumbed to the side effects, and several thousand died unnecessarily. We have documented this in earlier posts.
State governments engaged in brutal lockdowns.
Several governments, including the Victorian one, brutalized the populace. We saw people in Melbourne being attacked for leaving their homes. The tactics used were akin to what we see in China and other totalitarian regimes, but to what end? It didn't stop Covid.
The 'vaccine' did not stop transmission.
Everyone knows this. People were injected based on a false pretext that a genetic modification product was a vaccine when, in fact, it hijacked the body to produce a toxin. Many in the public have woken up to being duped. Some are angry for receiving multiple jabs and having several bouts of Covid-19.
There was an exponential increase in cases of myocarditis.
As cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough has stated many times, the Covid-19 'vaccines' have been the most significant cause of severe myocarditis since 2021. This is why the Australian government's health department created a diagnostic code for MRI for vaccine-induced myocarditis? Despite this, they continue to push for the injection of this poison into people's arms.
Contravention of international law
Human rights in many countries were violated, not just in Australia. The Nuremberg Code and the Helsinki Agreements were formulated to never again allow a violation of medical autonomy and to prevent medical abuse; these were violated.
Failure to compensate the vaccine injured.
To this day, the many thousands injured or killed by COVID-19 shots have received little compensation for being injected with a defective product.
The Covid era eroded confidence in public health.
This is a natural outcome of the public health authorities' failure on so many levels caught in a lie. As Dr Peter McCullough stated, trust has been lost in the healthcare industry because of misinformation on COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy. In all aspects, from vaccines stopping transmission and stopping the virus in its tracks to masks and lockdowns being the only way to save society, it was false. The ad, "We're all in this together," was a ruse.
Lockdowns killed people by delaying early cancer diagnosis.
The lockdowns inhibited people from getting tests that could detect early stages of cancer. Of course the acceleration in certain cancers due to the vaccines exacerbated this situation.
Excess mortality increased significantly after the rollout of the 'vaccine.'
As I mentioned in a previous post, excess mortality went up in Australia and has continued to remain up since the rollout of the jabs. So, what was the net effect of some COVID policies? Negative.
Doctors suspended for issuing vaccine exemptions.
Doctors continue to be hounded for issue exemptions for the Covid-19 vaccinations. If the do 'worse' and tell people to not take the jab, they risk losing their registration. Imagine that, telling a patient to avoid a risk, is grounds for suspension. What a world!
Now we have the latest indignity. Pauline Hanson, Queensland Senator for the One Nation Party, introduced the following bill:
COVID-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2022
Wouldn't a bill to prevent discrimination be a no-brainer in a normal society? However, there is nothing normal today.
Below are some relevant clauses. Read the portions in bold.
4 Meaning of discriminates
Discrimination by requiring proof of COVID19 vaccination
(1) Without limiting when a person discriminates against another person on the basis of whether the other person has received a COVID19 vaccination, the first person discriminates against the other person on that basis if the first person:
(a) requests or requires the other person to produce proof of having received a COVID19 vaccination; or
(b) discriminates against the other person on the basis of whether the other person has proof of having received a COVID19 vaccination.
Discrimination by unfavourable treatment
(2) Without limiting when a person discriminates against another person on the basis of whether the other person has received a COVID19 vaccination, a person (the first person) discriminates against another person (the second person) if the first person treats the second person less favourably than, in circumstances that are the same or are not materially different, the first person treats or would treat a person who has received a COVID19 vaccination.
Employment
(1) A person (the first person) must not discriminate against another person (the second person), in relation to the first person employing the second person, on the basis of whether the second person has received a COVID19vaccination.
So, nothing has changed from the perspective of what the government can do in the name of a pandemic or health 'emergency'. The next 'scare' the governments are considering is Monkey Pox or mPox. Will they decide in time to declare an emergency? It's in their power to do so. While the new kid on the block primarily affects those who engage in questionable sexual activity and has a low death rate, Big Pharma will undoubtedly push for everyone to take a new job.
So how does all this compare to deaths from other lifestyle choices, according to the WHO?
Where are the priorities?